Assessment of a Unit-Level Acuity Tool in Inpatient Psychiatry.

Assessing acuity is deemed essential to staffing in intensive care nursing; however, it has not received sufficient attention in inpatient psychiatry, where acuity can fluctuate greatly within shifts. Staffing and admission decisions rely on the accuracy of this information. The current mixed methods study surveyed nurses from two hospitals within the same hospital system: one using an acuity tool and one naïve to acuity tools. The survey was followed by a focus group on the specific factors influencing acuity and nurses' assessment of needs. Results suggest that the current tool is not satisfactory for nurses who use it to help with staffing or admission decisions and it is not user-friendly. Most nurses from both hospitals indicated they would prefer an electronic version with automated features reflecting up-to-date patient and unit acuity that would assist in interprofessional collaborative admissions decisions and staffing. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 62(1), 13-18.].

Exploratory Qualitative Focus Group Analysis of School-based Health Center Policy Issues: Insights From State Leaders.

INTRODUCTION: School-based health centers (SBHCs) provide students with critical, cost-effective access to health care. The pandemic accelerated a shift in SBHC care delivery. From the viewpoint of SBHC state leadership, this study aimed to describe changes since the last national SBHC health policy survey in 2017 through the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: Leaders from state offices funding SBHCs and of School-Based Health Alliance affiliates participated in semistructured virtual focus groups in early 2022. Qualitative researchers triangulated focus group data with open-ended survey questions and performed thematic content analysis. RESULTS: The results confirmed a priori themes of increased funding, challenges in alignment around the definition, standardization, and metrics of SBHCs, and pandemic-related changes. Emerging themes included: (1) increased mental health services, (2) a shift toward telehealth and increased access delivery models, and (3) workforce challenges. DISCUSSION: These themes drive further exploration to sustain positive change, overcome challenges, and guide future quantitative SBHC policy analysis.

Social Determinants of Health and Quality of Life in Endocrine Surgery Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Quality of life (QoL) of endocrine surgery patients is an important patient outcome but the role of social determinants of health (SDH) on preoperative QoL is understudied. METHODS: This study used preoperative data of 233 endocrine surgery patients participating in a longitudinal QoL study to examine the influence of SDH (patient-level and environmental) on preoperative QoL. Patient-level SDH was assessed with structured survey questions and environmental SDH with the Social Vulnerability Index. Multiple domains of QoL were assessed with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29). RESULTS: The average age of the sample was 52.9 y and 76.8% were female, 10% were Hispanic, 55.8% were White, 32.6% were Black, 6.9% were Other, and 4.7% were Asian. Patients with patient-level SDH were more likely to have worse preoperative QoL in multiple PROMIS domains. Patients who lived in the most socially vulnerable areas had the same or better QoL scores in the PROMIS-29 domains than those living in less vulnerable areas. Minority race patients were more likely to have patient-level SDH and to live in the most vulnerable areas. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to our knowledge to examine the role of patient-level and environmental SDH on preoperative QoL among endocrine surgery patients. The results identified specific patient-level factors that could be used as the basis for interventions aimed to improve patients' QoL. Future studies that evaluate the role of preoperative SDH on long-term QoL and clinical outcomes would further enhance our understanding of the impact of SDH on patient wellbeing.

Association of Obesity and Diabetes with SARS-Cov-2 Infection and Symptoms in the COVID-19 Community Research Partnership.

OBJECTIVE: Obesity and diabetes are established risk factors for severe SARS-CoV-2 outcomes, but less is known about their impact on susceptibility to COVID-19 infection and general symptom severity. We hypothesized that those with obesity or diabetes would be more likely to self-report a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, and among those with a positive test, have greater symptom severity and duration. METHODS: Among 44,430 COVID-19 Community Research Partnership participants, we evaluated the association of self-reported and electronic health record obesity and diabetes with a self-reported positive COVID-19 test at any time. Among the 2,663 participants with a self-reported positive COVID-19 test during the study, we evaluated the association of obesity and diabetes with self-report of symptom severity, duration, and hospitalization. Logistic regression models were adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and healthcare worker status. RESULTS: We found a positive graded association between Body Mass Index (BMI) category and positive COVID-19 test (Overweight OR = 1.14 [1.05-1.25]; Obesity I OR = 1.29 [1.17-2.42]; Obesity II OR = 1.34 [1.19-1.50]; Obesity III OR = 1.53 [1.35-1.73]), and a similar but weaker association with COVID-19 symptoms and severity among those with a positive test. Diabetes was associated with COVID-19 infection but not symptoms after adjustment, with some evidence of an interaction between obesity and diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: While the limitations of this health system convenience sample include generalizability and selection around test-seeking, the strong graded association of BMI and diabetes with self-reported COVID-19 infection suggests that obesity and diabetes may play a role in risk for symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 beyond co-occurrence with socioeconomic factors.

Assessment of hospitalization rates, factors associated with hospitalization and in-patient mortality in pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis.

INTRODUCTION: Cystic fibrosis (CF), an inherited autosomal recessive disease that results in the accumulation of mucus and damage primarily to the respiratory and digestive tracts is caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. In the United States, it has been estimated that CF occurs in 1 out of 3500 infants. The objective of this study was to explore the patient and hospital characteristics associated with CF hospitalizations and inpatient mortality in pediatric CF patients. METHODS: Utilizing the National Inpatient Sample database from 2008 to 2017, a retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the hospitalization rates, associated factors, and the inpatient mortality of CF patients 0-17 years of age. Hospitalizations with a diagnosis of CF were identified with ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes. Adjusted survey logistic regression models were utilized to determine factors associated with CF hospitalizations and in-hospital deaths in CF patients. RESULTS: There were a total of 98,660 (about 0.2%) CF hospitalizations in patients 17 years of age or younger during the study period. Non-Hispanic (NH) White CF patients had the highest prevalence of CF (26.30 per 10,000 hospitalizations). The prevalence of inpatient deaths were highest among those identified as NH-Others and NH-Blacks (71.35 and 68.83 per 10,000 CF hospitalizations, respectively. When compared with NH-White category, those belonging to NH-Black, Hispanic and Other racial/ethnic sub-group had reduced odds of being hospitalized with CF. DISCUSSION: Despite our finding of an increased likelihood of being hospitalized for CF among NH-White and male pediatric patients, no association between race or sex and CF inpatient death was observed when adjusted for covariates. More research is needed to determine the impact of sex and race on CF mortality rates.

The Available Criteria for Different Sepsis Scoring Systems in the Emergency Department-A Retrospective Assessment.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of the study was to assess the criteria availability of eight sepsis scoring methods within 6 hours of triage in the emergency department (ED). DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis study. SETTING: ED of MedStar Washington Hospital Center (MWHC), a 912-bed urban, tertiary hospital. PATIENTS: Adult (age ≥ 18 years) patients presenting to the MWHC ED between June 1, 2017 and May 31, 2018 and admitted with a diagnosis of severe sepsis with or without shock. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURED: Availability of sepsis scoring criteria of eight different sepsis scoring methods at three time points-0 Hours (T0), 3 Hours (T1) and 6 Hours (T2) after arrival to the ED. RESULTS: A total of 50 charts were reviewed, which included 23 (46%) males and 27 (54%) females. Forty-eight patients (96%) were Black or African American. Glasgow Coma Scale was available for all 50 patients at T0. Vital signs, except for temperature, were readily available (>90%) at T0. The majority of laboratory values relevant for sepsis scoring criteria were available (>90%) at T1, with exception to bilirubin (66%) and creatinine (80%). NEWS, PRESEP and qSOFA had greater than 90% criteria availability at triage. SOFA and SIRS consistently had the least percent of available criteria at all time points in the ED. CONCLUSION: The availability of patient data at different time points in a patient's ED visit suggests that different scoring methods could be utilized to assess for sepsis as more patient information becomes available.

Optimizing usability and signal capture: a proactive risk assessment for the implementation of a wireless vital sign monitoring system.

Wearable vital sign monitors are a promising step towards optimal patient surveillance, providing continuous data to allow for early detection and treatment of patient deterioration. However, as wearable monitors become more widely adopted in healthcare, there is a corresponding need to carefully design the implementation of these tools to promote their integration into clinical workflows and defend against potential misuse and patient harm. Prior to the roll-out of these monitors, our multidisciplinary team of clinicians, clinical engineers, information technologists and research investigators conducted a modified Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (HFMEA), a proactive evaluation of potential problems which could be encountered in the use of a wireless vital signs monitoring system. This evaluation was accomplished by focussing on the identification of procedures and actions that would be required during the devices' regular usage, as well as the implementation of the system as a comprehensive process. Using this method, the team identified challenges that would arise throughout the lifecycle of the device and developed recommendations to address them. This proactive risk assessment can guide the implementation of wearable patient monitors, optimising the use of innovative health information technology.

Assessment of Nursing Response to a Real-Time Alerting Tool for Sepsis: A Provider Survey.

Background: An information technology solution to provide a real-time alert to the nursing staff is necessary to assist in identifying patients who may have sepsis and avoid the devastating effects of its late recognition. The objective of this study is to evaluate the perception and adoption of sepsis clinical decision support. Methods: A cross-sectional survey over a three-week period in 2015 was conducted in a major tertiary care facility. A sepsis alert was launched into five pilot units (including: surgery, medical-ICU, step-down, general medicine, and oncology). The pilot unit providers consisted of nurses from five inpatient units. Frequency, summary statistics, Chi-square, and nonparametric Kendall tests were used to determine the significance of the association and correlation between six evaluation domains. Results: A total of 151 nurses responded (53% response rate). Questions included in the survey addressed the following domains: usability, accuracy, impact on workload, improved performance, provider preference, and physician response. The level of agreeability regarding physician response was significantly different between units (p=0.0136). There were significant differences for improved performance (p=0.0068) and physician response (p=0.0503) across levels of exposure to the alert. The strongest correlations were between questions related to usability and the domains of: accuracy (τ=0.64), performance (τ=0.66), and provider preference (τ=0.62), as well as, between the domains of: provider performance and provider preference (τ=0.67). Discussion: Performance and preference of providers were evaluated to identify strengths and weaknesses of the sepsis alert. Effective presentation of the alert, including how and what is displayed, may offer better cognitive support in identifying and treating septic patients.

Reductions in High-End Imaging Utilization With Radiology Review and Consultation.

Following the uptake of value-based purchasing in concert with health care reform in the United States, providers, insurers, and patients are looking for ways to reduce excessive, dangerous, and/or inappropriate high-end imaging utilization (HEIU). Inappropriate HEIU is associated with patient safety risks due to unnecessary exposure to radiation, misappropriation of scarce equipment resources and staff, complications to clinical care, and needless, excessive costs for the patient, hospital, and payer. This paper presents a cost-effective radiology-initiated improvement program piloted in the Christiana Hospital Coordinated Care Network. The pilot demonstrated the effectiveness of regulating high-end imaging orders through radiologists' review of requests of the order as part of the consult process. Over the 2014-2015 fiscal year, 2,177 high-end imaging orders were reviewed by 26 radiologists for approval, rejection, or recommendation of an alternate examination. Of the orders, 86.7% (1887) were approved, 4.0% (87) were rejected, and 9.3% (203) received recommendation for an alternate examination. Based on improved patient safety, cost savings, and appropriate resource use, these findings suggest that radiologists' review can effectively reduce excessive HEIU. This method, with an appropriate algorithm to assist with handling a larger volume of orders, would be ideal to implement systemwide to manage HEIU cost efficiency, simultaneously providing radiologists with more control in their area of expertise and positively impacting quality, safety, and value-based purchasing goals.

Preparing Biology Graduate Teaching Assistants for Their Roles as Instructors: An Assessment of Institutional Approaches.

The inconsistency of professional development (PD) in teaching for graduate teaching assistants (GTAs) is a widespread problem in higher education. Although GTAs serve an important role in retention of undergraduate science majors and in promotion of scientific literacy in nonmajors, they often lack preparation and ongoing support for teaching. Given the recent national focus on instructional quality in introductory courses, our goal was to use an online survey to identify current practices of teaching PD for biology GTAs and compare these results with the last national survey on this topic. In responses from 71 participant institutions, 96% reported some mandatory teaching preparation for biology GTAs; however, 52% of these programs required 10 or fewer hours per year. Respondents wanted to change their programs to include more pedagogical information and teaching observations with feedback to their GTAs. Programmatic self-ratings of satisfaction with GTA PD were positively correlated with the number of topics discussed during PD. Although more schools are requiring GTA PD for teaching compared with the last national survey, the lack of program breadth at many schools warrants a national conversation with regard to recent calls for improving undergraduate instruction.